LF: FULL ID

To:	"rsgb" <[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: FULL ID
From:	"mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:09:39 -0000
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

For those not prepared to send full callsign and insist on a single letter the answer is not to send any reports of reception and render their transmission

meaningless. I have never found it necessary on LF to use QRS slower than QRS 10 and normally QRS3 does the trick.

In the beginning there were some sending at QRS 60 and the odd QRS 120 but the full callsign was always sent and many QSO'S took place in spite of the time factor or duty cycle.

g3kev

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Full ID, Chris Re: LF: Full ID, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Full ID, John Rabson Re: LF: Full ID, mal hamilton LF: Full ID, Mike Dennison LF: RE: Full ID, Rik Strobbe Re: LF: RE: Full ID, Gary - G4WGT LF: FULL ID, mal hamilton <= LF: Full ID, Mike Dennison LF: Re: Full ID, mal hamilton LF: RE: Full ID, Rik Strobbe LF: Re: RE: Full ID, Chris Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID, Graham LF: Re: Full ID, STEVE MCDONALD Re: LF: Re: Full ID, Graham Re: LF: Re: Full ID, mal hamilton Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID, mal hamilton Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID, g4gvw

Previous by Date:	LF: Full ID, Mike Dennison
Next by Date:	LF: RE: Full ID, Rik Strobbe
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: RE: Full ID, Gary - G4WGT
Next by Thread:	LF: Full ID, Mike Dennison
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]