Re: LF: Re: VLF - distances achjeved

["mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>]

Are you referring to the msg sent earlier on from Stefan stating there was another BUG

Are you saying this is Rubbish or what do you mean please explain, I was only quoting an email that I read and advising John to be careful.

 

g3kev

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Roger Lapthorn

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 5:47 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF - distances achjeved

Rubbish 

Sent from my iPod Touch 4g

On 15 Dec 2010, at 17:11, "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:

John

Be careful what you publish for accuracy, there are conflicting reports about what takes place on VLF/LF/MF - lots of inaccuracies.

ie carriers seen but no ID then the questions on the reflector,  was that you if not who was it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I saw an X then a Y who was that? Too much guesswork and no positive ID

Published articles need hard facts and some people would believe anything they read. It is like newspapers often the facts are distorted to make a good story and it is hard to tell FACTS from FICTION

 

G3KEV

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: John Rabson

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:55 AM

Subject: LF: VLF - distances achjeved

I am writing a piece on VLF for the Cave Radio & Electronics Group Journal and would like to include distance records.  Can people please confirm that the following information is correct (or not)?

Above-ground antennas

Hz	ERP mW	From	To	km
8970	58	Heidelberg	Israel	2873
6470	9	Heidelberg	Breclav	904
5170	5	Heidelberg	Breclav	904

Earth current antennas

Hz	TX power W	Electrode spacing m	From	To	km
8970	250	600	Heidelberg	Roschbach	72
6470	250	600	Heidelberg	Roschbach	72
5170	250	600	Heidelberg	Roschbach	72

Thank you.

John F5VLF