To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: 137 kHz groundwave |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 26 May 2011 15:31:33 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1306420465; bh=fDUiNkTT7BoEAmz/mygd4O3QMl8HKQW6KAdChytKhzs=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=iM2nB+cXsSS2/m+maSZseBdJkaxz3rqEQNk2jm6AZdphWVSRbq5xKyd6mUmN7+4EpvtgWymXLFTiCtMh8Gg6QfdbpTcwlgfLZ6sGbrQBK37ctiVpOFfVH6rHbpC0pGY03cGLboyfKJBokvxdG/6ebcr6wYyK5ouwNYsFq+9t9kU= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=A7rNr2IK7siF6KtN4AlHxps/0tWKa78BR/aFvym61N3BiDjX12PHObnJeA1m1D21fXzUQt5TKi+Zt67G3FbhFrnc5/bLWjMhMxAF61T5cJgT/fStwuxIOBz7eT/IlGoINtLLtUOptXyhEKiFl4wbjU0zssMzEf6u+T27Q3AWb+M= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Stefan it may be daytime but both of those paths will be skywave even in daytime at your power levels. Skywave and groundwave are about the same starength at about 700km acording to all the papers. Dont forget the waterfals are very non-linear it only takes about 3dB change in signal strength to go from T to O+++, also you are seeing S/N which may be higher in 4X4 although I got a rumble overhead a few minites ago and the rain was horizontal. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 1:51 PM Subject: LF: 137 kHz groundwave > LF, > > I just sent some CQ calls on 137.71 kHz and saw the signal at about the > same strength on the G4WGT grabber in 910 km, O copy. But there is no > trace at all on the YO/4X1RF grabber in 1426 km (in QRSS-10). The 137 > kHz groundwave seems to "stop" somewhere between these distances, maybe > arround 1000km. > I'm sure some of you have some better theoretical and/or practical > experience about that? > Another advantage of VLF,where it's "easy" to reach 2500 km and above > anytime :-) > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: 137 kHz groundwave, Rik Strobbe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: 137 kHz groundwave, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: 137 kHz groundwave, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz groundwave, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |