Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today

from [Alan Melia] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "RSGB LF Gp" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:32:46 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1287871408; bh=a8ZMTlzBsL9lz7mxmjxt8ubQ+O0WBNTapqtuByVphyc=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=AcnJuXjlh7yt8hKSUyqCdfbySxbXJE3/Np/MJ2Hr5kGaTDZzAPZYzVJZo5rN239kF/ebrY6vMxQdWOXcAZS4B8+PdF/8ZbLIoYb/3Wv7ltBhfYWOo/2vviG/jGdYFsFnU2KYKhFslgSNyfDBwZpbmb+tmbFbOkU47wsb9VLtphY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=km/nbEkwSC4cOso/wFmbBQ2iH1KZPtqGcitQoMpOkUlqTpsPMEq47U5dg8RBttVYHtu8m6pqAYqe1TrkwsJ2RocfVzEagnTBhPXf60a8MOwxClL0VfumHwlMzuwtSrnrv0T5tOJr1OfElytePkBayTmDTpCDXjnKHYXB7EzhwtU= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] 
In theory, if you communicate, yes! They reserve the right to make the
decision to approve, and laser comms are under their "regulation"

Alan


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 9:09 AM
Subject: RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today


> So you need permission to switch on a light???
>
> 73
>
> Victor
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]Namens Alan Melia
> Verzonden: vrijdag 22 oktober 2010 22:14
> Aan: [email protected]
> Onderwerp: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today
>
>
> No a good idea Jacek Ofcoms regulatory powers do not end at 9kHz. They
have
> powers over radiation at any frequency.
> Alan G3NYK
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jacek Lipkowski" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:45 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today
>
>
> > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote:
> >
> > > *Frequencies allowed:*   8.7kHz - 9.1kHz
> >
> > i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz
> > (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a
trick
> > by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction?
> >
> > VY 73
> >
> > Jacek / SQ5BPF
> >
> >
>
>
>
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: VLF: here no results from DK7FC's 8th experiment, Jacek Lipkowski
Next by Date:  Re: LF: OK2BVG_600m, Graham
Previous by Thread:  LF: test 8.97kHz by DK7FC , received today in JN06HT, "Jean-Pierre Méré (F1AFJ)"
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, Graham
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]