Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Re: ARRL News Story |
| From: | "mike.dennison" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:00:19 -0000 |
| References: | <3A83E830.5192.C534B3@localhost> <005d01c092d6$8b7dada0$aab21bca@xtr743187> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
ZL2CA wrote: I do not agree with your glossing over error-rate in articles: Editorial errors give the publisher a bad image with knowledgeable readers. Getting it right the first time takes a lot of beating. I agree entirely that 100% accuracy should always be the aim, and I believe that RadCom and QST both have a high hit rate, but the point I was making was that a story with some errors in it will still do more good for the LF fraternity than no story at all. 37 Moke, X3GDV |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: DCF39 frequency, Peter Cleall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: W1JHJ and W3EEE reception reports, Dave |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: ARRL News Story, Vernall |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Re: ARRL News Story, Vernall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |