To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: 503.40 CW CQ from Shetland |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:41:15 +0100 |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=ejJyR80wEfDp4taNY7utyYxQPmqmO/KnW2dqTTiMTpODNFvjTLHLPENxKRdPA97iqDiXmDNT1O1H+bQKiFl0Q+c5UzQorWRyXUVNopAzJbCAZxFmWE2EPm46MErD9DQCmjgFapHg0me5cB/ZBWWe+FiY07/XHTrbpL5W3cw6v/s= ; |
Domainkey-status: | bad (test mode) |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]><001b01c7cb79$6fa823c0$6eccfc3e@g3kev> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear John, Nil seen this morning - guess will have to wait until darkness. I tried putting the numbers into the late G4FGQ's Grndwav3 ground-wave calculating software. Assuming about 660km G3KEV - GM4SLV, 100mW ERP (=55mW EMRP)and a sea path the whole way virtually, the received signal level should be about 0.7uV/m, which might be audible on a quiet band. For inland stations, the ground wave losses increase a lot, so some sort of ionospheric propagation probably will be essential for a successful QSO. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 503.40 CW CQ from Shetland, Brian |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: 136: Still alive !, dl4yhf |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 503.40 CW CQ from Shetland, Brian |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 503.40 CW CQ from Shetland, John GM4SLV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |