To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: ARRL News Story |
From: | "Vernall" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 10 Feb 2001 09:22:13 +1300 |
References: | <3A83E830.5192.C534B3@localhost> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Mike, I do not agree with your glossing over error-rate in articles: It has been pointed out, quite correctly, that the ARRL story about LF operating has errors in it. In defense of my fellow journalists, I will say that given limited resources it is inevitable that some errors will creep into any article. Editorial errors give the publisher a bad image with knowledgeable readers. Getting it right the first time takes a lot of beating. 73, Bob ZL2CA |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: LF tests., John Currie |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: VA3LK small Freq. change, Larry Kayser |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: ARRL News Story, an objection, Larry Kayser |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: ARRL News Story, mike.dennison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |