Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: RE: email qso

To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: LF: RE: email qso
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 15:18:57 +0100
In-reply-to: <01ff01c8b369$c764f740$0301a8c0@g3kev>
References: <01ff01c8b369$c764f740$0301a8c0@g3kev>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Thread-index: AcizajZcf6gcIpXyQj2hdzmMHqSFpAAByVkg
Mal,

If UK stations who hold an NoV wish to experiment or research in their own
way what is wrong with that?

If they are operating & experimenting within the terms of the amateur
licence & NoV then NO PROBLEM !!

Gary - G4WGT.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of mal
Sent: 11 May 2008 14:20
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: email qso

I can hear a stn calling CQ on 500 khz and pse qsl via EMAIL !!!!!!!!!!!!
The trend on 500 seems to be Beacon mode and reply via email or watch your
own signal on a Grabber !!!!!!
Real QSO'S on this band are very rare. Is this what was intended when
permits were issued to experiment on 500?
G3KEV




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>