Ok Bill
I am now fired up on all cylinders on 136.173 just above Stefan, qrs 30
which worked well in the past. Using a new TX and less power at present
about 0.5w erp. If condx half reasonable you should see something.
Hope to get back to 1w erp soon
de mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill de Carle" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: LF: beaconing to the west II ...and to the east, north and
south...
> Stefan:
> Just to be sure everything was OK, I transmitted (using a ferrite rod
> Tx antenna!) a marker at 136170.000 Hz and to my surprise, it showed
> up on your version about half a Hz low! I had not entered a close
> estimate for the 48000 sampling rate and apparently SL locked onto
> something else? I measured the actual sample rate at 48000.10944,
> entered that and thereafter the displayed line jumped right up to
> 136.170 Khz. My usr uses 22050 (which is actually 22200.0653), but I
> had already typed that in last night. I'm not sure how Windows XP
> handles things when two applications are inputting simultaneously
> using different sample rates. At this time both instances have the
> sampling rate correction enabled and the TS-850 is still set for CW
> mode 500 Hz narrow filter - that's the way your .usr file assumed
> it. At some point while I was measuring things SL appeared to redraw
> the LF_EU60 display and now both versions show the marker on the same
> frequency. Almost as if the two versions were comparing notes :-)
> I'll either take the marker away or turn it off if Mal wants to use
> that freq. I am using V2.77 b02 of Spectrum Lab for this test.
> 73,
> Bill VE2IQ
>
> At 01:53 PM 9/7/2011, Stefan wrote:
> >Thanks Bill ;-) The webpage looks fine! :-)
> >
> >At G4WGT i can see Mal TXing nearly 136.172. Will he join in? Oh, it
> >seems i really have to finish that PA supply ;-)
> >Looking forward to that evening! Unfortunately there will be some
> >rain it seems. That may cost a dB or so...
>
>
|
