|
Thanks to Markus for results.
73, Bob ZL2CA
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:00
AM
Subject: Re: LF: Weak signals
Dear Bob, Teo and LF,
tonight's signals
sorted by frequency were
18:00...19:52 923.19...922.98 qrss120
"S52AB"
18:02...18:24 922.06/21.96; 18:27...19:15 921.99/.89
dfcw100 DF6"NM" (0.3W EMRP)
17:02...19:21 921.73...921.71 qrss60
YU7"AR"
18:00...20:44 921.58/.51...921.39/.31 dfcw180 G3"AQC"
http://members.aol.com/df6nm2/testEu0504022100.gif
(142kB)
Unfortunately the detective's vision on signal timing was
somewhat impaired, due to the fragmentation by his own transmitted dashes. But
time and frequency of your trace clearly indicate that you have caught Teo's
fifth "AR", which he sent from 18:27 to 18:42.
The signal was visible
on both Argo30s (21mHz, 12s) and Argo120s (5mHz, 3s) settings. BTW my own
preferred setting usually is "90s slow", as it provides a reasonably long
screenfill duration with less "pixel-stretching" at 10 milliHz
resolution.
73 and all the best
Markus, DF6NM
In einer eMail vom 02.04.2005 23:12:28 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit
schreibt [email protected]:
Hi all,
It looks like more weak signals in captures
viewed this morning. I've sent
30 and 120 second dot length Argo
files to Detective Vester for analysis.
73, Bob ZL2CA
|
