To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Re: CA Broadcast TX, LF beacon? |
From: | "John Andrews" <w1tag@charter.net> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:19:40 +0100 |
References: | <001501c45c62$5f3b78e0$de4124d5@jeff> <000a01c45c6c$0863d440$4f86fea9@maine> <000f01c45c82$e343ed00$244024d5@jeff> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Jeff, If CFH returns, it will likely be on 137.000. You will know it by the loud groans from over here, and the cheering from Alan! There is no other continuous high power source from the U.S. near the 137 kHz band. There will be more experimental stations on the air by next winter, though, so stay tuned. My operation is intermittent, but I try to give advance notice on this mail list if conditions look good. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES WD2XES Status: http://webpages.charter.net/w1tag/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Re: CA Broadcast TX, LF beacon?, F6CWN |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: The signal on 133.1KHz..., Scott Tilley |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re²: TX, LF beacon, F6CWN |
Next by Thread: | LF: ... Re: CA Broadcast TX, LF beacon?, F6CWN |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |