Re: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?

["mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>]

Jim

It looks more like a message from a  GOOSEBERRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

g3kev

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: james.cowburn@virgin.net

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 5:10 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?

Dinosaur! ;-) ned ludd of radio! Just teasing Mal!

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

---

From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>

Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:57:08 +0100

To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>

ReplyTo: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Subject: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?

Roger

QRS is always better than wspr. Only one level of demodulation needed, just read the dots/dashes as displayed on screen, whereas wspr and other similar data modes need further demodulation, for example vy weak wspr traces that do not demodulate could easily be read had it been on/off keyed QRS mode.

QRS is also a good real time QSO mode, next best thing to normal CW

 

de mal/g3kev

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Roger Lapthorn

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 4:42 PM

Subject: LF: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?

A question for the coding experts here: WSPR is an excellent weak signal beaconing mode, but at what QRSS speed is QRSS "better" ?

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/