Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing...

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing...
From:	"Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:41:25 +0100
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=0SAnqp9U9T6ln5G7pnnzonywcXHDjWjATGUMFumNyFO5xSxkWhdeQ6F87avExlq1Cv/yyZcvp6XeFyPh3Ezb2KCbQNUtvqKwm/JWZRyrdoQL8YYprI5VGHpFGsBXxH0s3X2mC9y+SGeW4jpd9QHL+mkZyZI45bpr7gRrRnDINkI= ;
Domainkey-status:	good (test mode)
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
References:	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Come on Dave.......if he hadn't been beaconing you wouldnt have known you
could hear him !! Surely there are enough 200Hz slots on the band to move to
for QSOs. We can do without snide comments, we all know your feelings and we
all have to exist on the band together ... "experimenting" .... which is
what the permit was granted for. Your problem only occurs for a few miles
around Dave's location he is transmitting very low power, what about the
rest of us who have a quiet band at the moment?

Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Sergeant <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 24 July 2007 10:56
Subject: RE: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing...

> On 24 Jul 2007 at 10:26, Michael Probert wrote:
>
> > Beacon on 503.8 now @ 10.25 BST. Is this frequency clear?
>
> Well I can copy you well (539) in the gaps of G0MRF's beacon (on
> about 503.75). Both well inside even my 200Hz filter.... band ain't
> wide enough for all these beacons if we are to leave some room for
> actual QSOs...
>
> 73 Dave G3YMC
>
> http://www.davesergeant.com
>
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: 500; Two GW's Testing..., (continued) LF: Re: 500; Two GW's Testing..., Gary - G4WGT LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Dave G3WCB LF: Re: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Gw3UEP LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Dave G3WCB LF: Re: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Alan Melia Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Dave Sergeant RE: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Michael Probert RE: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Dave Sergeant RE: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Michael Probert RE: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Dave Sergeant Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Alan Melia <= Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., John GM4SLV Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Gary - G4WGT LF: G4WGT beacon, James Moritz LF: Re: G4WGT beacon, Gary - G4WGT Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., James Moritz Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Gw3UEP Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., James Moritz Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Gw3UEP Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., James Moritz Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Gw3UEP

Previous by Date:	RE: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Dave Sergeant
Next by Date:	Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., James Moritz
Previous by Thread:	RE: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., Dave Sergeant
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing..., John GM4SLV
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]