Re: LF: X-tal...wanted !

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: X-tal...wanted !
From:	"Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:28:25 +0100
References:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

To Allm from PA0SE

Rik, ON7YD wrote:

i just had a look in the junkbox ... nothing arround these frequencies

here.

If you don't find the 10836 or 10564kHz xtals you might consider using a
xtal on the 3rd overtone, that would be 3612 or 3521kHz. These are
frequencies in the 80m band, so much greater chance to find them among

hams.

But beware; the overtones are not exact multiples of the fundamental
frequency. In the examples above the frequency difference with the third
HARMONIC could easily be 10kHz or more.

73, Dick, PA0SE

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: X-tal...wanted !, Richard Gasparik Re: LF: X-tal...wanted !, Rik Strobbe Re: LF: X-tal...wanted !, Dick Rollema <= LF: Re: X-tal...wanted !, Robin T. Greenwood

Previous by Date:	LF: QRV again..., Richard Gasparik
Next by Date:	LF: Re: X-tal...wanted !, Robin T. Greenwood
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: X-tal...wanted !, Rik Strobbe
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: X-tal...wanted !, Robin T. Greenwood
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]