LF: Re: Dead Band?

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: Re: Dead Band?
From:	"Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 14 May 2007 19:53:08 +0100
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=eei9PuCgxyviDaAU68IynQ4YOiwUDcJe8xUnNZdsx0i3TTXk/opW4zEVRFLipT174tnjiFwYSgQyDS2iqLyCgqhUZ92fPygrlIxNtiJ72N6+75fVzLDv0QNFTVhGxCmFmrtDn/wHH6rSn0z8aUiidIZM3KUVXv2GwH8eJypbSCM= ;
Domainkey-status:	bad (test mode)
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
References:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

There is a strong carrier on 503.33 I think it must be G3UNT from the
strength.

Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 14 May 2007 19:36
Subject: LF: Dead Band?


>
> I am calling CQ just below 502. Not a sausage around tonight apart from
> G3YVF testing his loft antenna for 502!
>
> Anybody around tonight?
>
>
>
> G3VTT
>
>
>
>
>
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Dead Band?, G3vtt LF: Re: Dead Band?, Alan Melia <= LF: [500] Dead Band?, Dave G3WCB LF: Re: [500] Dead Band?, Alan Melia LF: RE: Re: [500] Dead Band?, Dave G3WCB

Previous by Date:	LF: Dead Band?, G3vtt
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Re: Dead Band?, G3vtt
Previous by Thread:	LF: Dead Band?, G3vtt
Next by Thread:	LF: [500] Dead Band?, Dave G3WCB
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]