Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ??

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ??
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 08:00:36 -0000
References: <DF04F1B426284824AAC4CCC935179578@AGB> <00d101cc8385$36ca2c10$4001a8c0@lark> <96322D70F9974098BE3BAD32EC55648F@AGB> <CAA8k23TuRdafPnVmd0Y8YgoWRMzL5_8mjbbUizkuksSadWzjyA@mail.gmail.com> <1317850793.4144.27.camel@pat-compaq-evo> <000d01cc83aa$41c1ca40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1317857588.4715.4.camel@pat-compaq-evo>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
You pretend sometimes to disagree to provoke an argument, which is good, it
winds others UP, then they settle down and Agree!!
I forgot to mention the Appliance Operators sidekick, Beacon Bandslip
Operator (BBO) churning out endless repeative call and locator and qsl via
the web.
Amateur radio sport is now ahead of clay pigeon shooting !!!!
I am now running for shelter !!
g3kev


----- Original Message -----
From: "g4gvw" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ??


> Ahh! Well, Mal but we still differ! I prefer the term Radio
> Experimenter. "Operation" is an experimental science too!
>
> 73
>
>
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 21:55 +0000, mal hamilton wrote:
> > Everyone agrees with me sooner or later, it's just some are slower than
> > others to admit it !!
> > Maybe there ought to be two conventions, one for Radio Operators and one
for
> > Appliance Operators.
> > G3KEV
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "g4gvw" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 9:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ??
> >
> >
> > > Actually Andy, I've just had an exchange of emails with my mate Alan
> > > 3nyk (near neighbour) in which I have mooted the idea that maybe now
is
> > > the time for a realignment of the Royal Surrey Gas Board. Membership
is
> > > falling, my guess is that this is proportionate to 'genuine' amateur
> > > activity and that a realignment into organisations, some of which
might
> > > be absorbed or merged into other technical or scientific bodies. This
> > > might seem sacraligeous (gosh, can't even spell the word)  to some but
I
> > > cannot feel that experimental and developmental aspects are best
served
> > > by the status quo!
> > >
> > > Having had to deal with the "powers that be" in a professional
context,
> > > I cannot believe they are, any more, convinced that "QSL Card Bashing"
> > > is any more than a sport carried out by "appliance operators" (see,
I'm
> > > not always at loggerheads with Mal hi.) The modern "appliance" radio
> > > rarely requires a huge amount of "self-training". Those ops who don't
> > > have the technical "nous" to adapt to modes and frequencies that
cannot
> > > be bought "off the shelf" tend to be just what Mal calls "appliance
> > > operators".
> > >
> > > Ok I'm now an "old fogey" but I'd far rather count frequency than
> > > countries and squares (been there, done that).
> > >
> > > I bet that if Maxwell were still around today, he'd have had a
callsign!
> > >
> > > But, he wouldn't have been chasing squares!
> > >
> > >
> > > 73
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 21:19 +0100, Andy Talbot wrote:
> > > > A few years ago, the convention and all RSGB activity was so HF
> > > > orientated us technolgists and microwavers were alienated.  At long
> > > > last everything has been equalised and the conventions merged, so
> > > > technology and techniques for the whole spectrum can be covered for
> > > > all.
> > > >
> > > > Did anyone offer any LF / MF talks ?
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > > www.g4jnt.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5 October 2011 18:56, Graham <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >         True but looks like the   fast-food  gang are slowly
> > > >         taking over !..An   Inevitability  of  combining  the  HF
> > > >         and  VHF  shows  I  suppose..
> > > >
> > > >         Coupled to  a  lack  of  solar  activity  that  depressed
> > > >         the  HF band  occupancy  ..
> > > >
> > > >         G..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >         --------------------------------------------------
> > > >         From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
> > > >         Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:33 PM
> > > >         To: <[email protected]>
> > > >         Subject: LF: Re: RSGB Convention   MF side looks a  bit
> > > >          thin ??
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >                 I think it's like all these things Graham......it
> > > >                 depends what papers are
> > > >                 offered. If no-one offers any lectures you dont get
a
> > > >                 stream.
> > > >
> > > >                 Alan
> > > >
> > > >                 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham"
> > > >                 <[email protected]>
> > > >                 To: <[email protected]>
> > > >                 Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 5:30 PM
> > > >                 Subject: LF: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit
> > > >                 thin ??
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >                 RSGB Convention   MF side looks a  bit  thin ??  Is
> > > >                  there a  real   HF/
> > > >                 MF/LF   convention   anywhere   ??
> > > >
> > > >                 Dave's  45  min slot  on the  Sunday looks to be
> > > >                  'it' ?
> > > >
> > > >                 Don't  mind  mini-waves  ...   just  a bit  like
> > > >                 being  at  work  over the
> > > >                 weekend .. !
> > > >
> > > >                 G..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > 73 es gd dx de pat g4gvw
> > >  qth nr felixstowe uk
> > > (east coast, county of suffolk)
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
> 73 es gd dx de pat g4gvw
>  qth nr felixstowe uk
> (east coast, county of suffolk)
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>