Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: {Spam?} Active_antennas |
| From: | "Roelof Bakker" <roelof@ndb.demon.nl> |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:57:09 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:58:10 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | dave@picks.force9.co.uk |
| References: | <007001c62a34$97e808b0$2101a8c0@AUG2004> <43E6FD76.4060304@g3ysx.org.uk> |
| Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
| Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Hello Stewart,I have tested this on an open perfectly flat country site. The test site was located on an inland dyke, which itself was 6 metre above the surrounding fields. Raising the antenna gave much more signal.The screening from the surroundings is also a fact. In my suburban city location, signal strength is considerable less (14 dB for the same height) than in an open field location. Fortunately this does not impair reception at all, as s/n is the same.Besides a theoritical point of few, the stronger signals on a higher pole are irrelevant as the main problem with this type of antenna is the massive signal levels produced. Not the lack of it! Best regards,Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Re: LF: New LF VLF ULF Forum, g0kzz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: RX9BS, Dmitri |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: {Spam?} Active_antennas, Stewart Bryant |
| Next by Thread: | LF: NEW, hamilton mal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |