| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Re: 135.92 warning |
| From: | "John Andrews" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:15:02 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:12:11 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
| References: | <001401c5c9b1$4ebe0ec0$8d01a8c0@JKA> <001a01c5c9b7$80430080$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Jay, ...it was necessary to move at least 25 kHz outside the carriers. Now, THAT's a wide signal! <g> JA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: 135.92 warning, Jay Rusgrove |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 135.92 warning, Scott Tilley, VE7TIL |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: 135.92 warning, Jay Rusgrove |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 135.92 warning, Scott Tilley, VE7TIL |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |