Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: WSPR-15 T/A

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 T/A
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:04:56 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1359306295; bh=zmyVDX3avoCdbxjQ6p8x8AqmKKDCNKwiuVCzZYrajFs=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=hLaJE/NeTIemYvAKTyxVP052MkY8apWdTcf9p8fIKlg0ApzZXKCMn/IgK38Djsq04 gTc0AkQpQpISMR/Q7qpUH/Thz26m/dXdGAlyC6yuQnkanpAZCNDpDcPkbC2ZZ496ZF gqDnV3kgmJNFm+8Kavv+VjLMAFRBf9AMyJNhQvMMrNMpAjRhGkduMW3JC5vhWs6wOy bFW05HhabmHHHH4ow4F4MD6Ba1zOZq3s4HtUPz9ajdNkGLxbd39sZ0wgcRMGdjAXmj Xd70NpFXgPZp23vE3uB89OKL3LtPaUxHLu4YKywve1dANexsgEg+mvZo2XscdtN79m XfpDIDi8kMh8w==
References: <[email protected]> <864CD011404848229DCA5BB524F5BFCA@Black> <03229F4C768F449AB4435A033DE9EB4A@SV8CSHP> <001f01cdfc93$02a12640$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
>9 UTC was my last transmission
 
Too bad there wasn't one or two more.
 
>Jay, didn't you say that there is no chance for the TA path when DST levels are below -20 nT?
 
Don't think I said 'no chance' ... just that conditions deteriorate below that level. Don't forget that this time of year we have a number of extra dB headroom (or maybe footroom) since background noise is lower enhancing s/n. Whatever happened yesterday was a small event of very short duration with DST only momentarily hitting -40 nT and recovery beginning immediately thereafter. The plot we refer to is only a real time 'prediction' and the final results may turn out to be different. As Alan might quip, what we saw yesterday might have only been a ripple in the jello ;~)
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2       
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 T/A

Hi Jay,

Thanks.
9 UTC was my last transmission! Last night as i looked to the DST levels i didn't expect much over the TA path. But somehow it seems that the conds have been improved to longer times in the morning. -32 dB at 9 UTC is quite impressing/interesting.
Any explanations from the experts? Jay, didn't you say that there is no chance for the TA path when DST levels are below -20 nT?
Nice band!

73, cul, Stefan


Am 27.01.2013 14:34, schrieb [email protected]:
Stefan & T/A enthusiasts
 
Interesting ... 9-1/2 hours of uninterrupted copy this end. Also interesting is that decodes continued to 0900Z (latest I've seen) ... with Stefan's sunrise 0703Z I believe. DST started the evening at -40 nT but has improved to -25 nT currently.     
 
2013-01-27 09:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -32  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 08:30  DK7FC  0.137615  -34  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 08:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -34  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 07:30  DK7FC  0.137615  -29  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 07:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -23  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 06:30  DK7FC  0.137615  -20  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 06:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -17  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 05:30  DK7FC  0.137615  -18  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 05:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -21  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 04:30  DK7FC  0.137615  -21  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 04:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -17  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 03:30  DK7FC  0.137615  -18  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 03:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -19  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 02:30  DK7FC  0.137615  -27  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 02:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -24  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 01:30  DK7FC  0.137615  -32  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 01:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -28  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 00:30  DK7FC  0.137615  -32  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-27 00:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -26  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-26 23:30  DK7FC  0.137615  -30  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295
2013-01-26 22:00  DK7FC  0.137615  -33  0  JN49ik  1  WD2XNS  FN31ls  6099  295 
 
Similar results the other direction with G8HUH having solid copy over a number of hours ... with last decode at 0845Z.
 
2013-01-27 08:45  WD2XNS  0.137613  -33  0  FN31ls  1  G8HUH  IO81mg  5255  53
2013-01-27 08:15  WD2XNS  0.137613  -36  0  FN31ls  1  G8HUH  IO81mg  5255  53
2013-01-27 07:45  WD2XNS  0.137613  -29  0  FN31ls  1  G8HUH  IO81mg  5255  53
2013-01-27 07:15  WD2XNS  0.137613  -28  0  FN31ls  1  G8HUH  IO81mg  5255  53
2013-01-27 06:45  WD2XNS  0.137613  -30  0  FN31ls  1  G8HUH  IO81mg  5255  53
2013-01-27 06:15  WD2XNS  0.137613  -25  0  FN31ls  1  G8HUH  IO81mg  5255  53
2013-01-27 05:45  WD2XNS  0.137613  -27  0  FN31ls  1  G8HUH  IO81mg  5255  53
2013-01-27 05:15  WD2XNS  0.137613  -30  0  FN31ls  1  G8HUH  IO81mg  5255  53
2013-01-27 04:45  WD2XNS  0.137613  -35  0  FN31ls  1  G8HUH  IO81mg  5255  53
2013-01-27 04:15  WD2XNS  0.137613  -33  0  FN31ls  1  G8HUH  IO81mg  5255  53
 
Thanks also to Hartmut for his spots ... and on advise for frequency change to avoid loran lines.
 
2013-01-27 06:15  WD2XNS  0.137612  -37  0  FN31ls  1  DL-SWL  JO52hp  6070  48
2013-01-27 05:45  WD2XNS  0.137612  -35  0  FN31ls  1  DL-SWL  JO52hp  6070  48
2013-01-27 00:45  WD2XNS  0.137612  -35  0  FN31ls  1  DL-SWL  JO52hp  6070  48
2013-01-27 00:15  WD2XNS  0.137612  -36  0  FN31ls  1  DL-SWL  JO52hp  6070  48 
 
Would like to know details of G8HUH receiving setup. 
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>