Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test

from [Graham] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 17:23:51 -0000
References: <00bd01c81e2c$b6825c10$f7636a58@wgt01> <000701c81e48$e7e8ee60$14e4fc3e@g3kev> <[email protected]> <004301c81ed0$8c7ecc10$56ebfc3e@g3kev>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
.... you start to see the disenchantment caused by by the path of 'non linearity' , as steam gave way to sail , mark/space has given way to multiplex ..... 

G ..
----- Original Message ----- From: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]> 
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test
The appliance operators of today could not handle SPARK nor have they heard 
about such things as crystal sets.
You have obviously picked up an old comic !!!!!!!!!!!! or you are older than 
you think.

Mal/G3KEV

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test



> All class A UK radio amateurs have passed the code test, so why bother

with

> a mode that noone else bothers about.

Better yet, use spark, so the chaps with crystal sets aren't excluded.

John Andrews, W1TAG








--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.19/1106 - Release Date: 11/2/2007 21:46
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Re: CLASS D and E, Andy Talbot
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test, Graham
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test, hamilton mal
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test, John GM4SLV
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]