LF: Re: 600 V 160

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: Re: 600 V 160
From:	"Graham" <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:57:47 +0100
Authentication-results:	mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
References:	<000701c7e00c$d96bf9b0$15e4fc3e@g3kev>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Would have to  be at night, 1.8  wont travel that well during the day ?

G ..

---- Original Message -----From: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>

To: "rsgb" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 2:53 PM
Subject: LF: 600 V 160

Hi all
It would be interesting to try both bands at the same time over a givenpath
to compare propagation.
I am using a 1/4 wave inv L on each band, both at the same height, and can
run the same pwr if anyone else would like to try it.
This could be a useful experiment for OFCOM purposes to justify more RF on
600 metres.
73 mal/g3kev





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/955 - Release Date: 8/15/200716:55

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: 600 V 160, hamilton mal LF: RE: 600 V 160, John W Gould Re: LF: RE: 600 V 160, Dave Sergeant LF: Re: RE: 600 V 160, hamilton mal LF: Re: 600 V 160, Graham <= LF: Re: Re: 600 V 160, hamilton mal

Previous by Date:	LF: RE: 600 V 160, John W Gould
Next by Date:	Re: LF: RE: 600 V 160, Dave Sergeant
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: RE: 600 V 160, hamilton mal
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: Re: 600 V 160, hamilton mal
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]