Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Re: jason etc |
| From: | "Steve Thompson" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:49:08 -0000 |
| References: | <004001c2a6c8$8c75de00$74e9fc3e@l8p8y6> <001401c2a6d9$13882a00$482965d5@oemcomputer> <000e01c2a6db$0d7f7260$09dc9384@jka> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
----- Original Message ----- From: John Andrews <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: 18 December 2002 21:18 Subject: LF: Re: Re: jason etc > and a similar antenna at the receiving end instead of small loops or 3 feet active type antennas. Just curious -- since the signal to noise ratio in my receiving installation appears to be limited by external (man-made and atmospheric) noise, rather than noise in my preamp/receiver, how would a 100 foot tower improve that situation? Think how clearly you'd be able to hear the noise :-) Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Signal report, José Manuel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: M0BMU Jason Success!, MarkusVester |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: jason etc, John Andrews |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Re: jason etc, hamilton mal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |