To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Ground loss diffferences between loops and verticals |
From: | "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 10 Apr 2002 08:22:10 +0100 |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
W0EH wrote: Get that bottom run at least 5' up from the ground and it will work much better. Do you have any trees to string the #12 wire in??? I have a LF loop with the top run at 60 to 70'. The bottom run is adjustable for testing purposes. It is strung over two big trees per Bill Ashlock's advise. I call it my Ashlock loop. Although this is good advice, it depends on individual circumstances. In my case raising the base would reduce the overall area as I cannot increase the overall height. But there again I don't have a 100 foot guyed tower in my garden... Dave G3YMC [email protected] [email protected] http://www.dsergeant.btinternet.co.uk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Ground loss diffferences between loops and verticals, WE0H |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: GPS Modules cheaper still !, Talbot Andrew |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Ground loss diffferences between loops and verticals, WE0H |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: still more loop inductance formulas, Claudio Girardi |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |