Look at it this way. An air wound coil by itself will induce a voltage into
a radio receiver whereas a ferrite rod by itself will NOT, so the ferrite
rod enhances the air wound coil. Is it a question of defination
I am just trying to look at it logically, and in simplistic terms
g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Trask" <christrask@earthlink.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?
> >
> > Oh my god.
> >
> > > *Thus the ferrite rod has never been the 'antenna' energising the
coil,
> > > because it has always been the _antenna coil_ energising the ferrite
> > > rod! *
> >
> > What a complete and utter pseudo-scientific nonsense.
> >
>
> Just wait until you read the rest of his electromagnetic fantasies,
such
> as the part where he claims that there is no magnetic field in a
propagating
> EM wave. He's not the first one to create new EM theories because he
fails
> to understand the long-accepted ones.
>
> Chris Trask
> N7ZWY / WDX3HLB
> Senior Member IEEE
> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~christrask/
>
>
|
