Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re. No US Ham band -poohey

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re. No US Ham band -poohey
From: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 12:25:35 +0100
References: <000901c31f79$a8c9b0c0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
I think it would be best to keep clear of top end of the band which might
be
in use for local QRSS contacts,and also when looking for VA3LK I had
strong
Loran interference on 137.7446. So I would suggest we continue to use the
old T/A slot below 136 and would prefer 135.922 since that freq is quiet
here and reasonably clear of SXV.
73 Laurie.

I also favour the low end of the band as Luxembourg effect QRM is bad at the
HF end in the evenings.

But if we use that frequency for receive, is the high end (eg 137.770kHz) OK
for receiving Eu in the USA?

Mike, G3XDV
http://www.lf.thersgb.net
====================




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>