To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF |
From: | "John Andrews" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:24:42 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:13:49 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dave, Is there a lower slot? I don't want to annoy all those nocturnal CW operators... Well, we certainly wouldn't want to annoy all of those guys, would we? A quick search doesn't turn up anything ideal, but 136.082 isn't too bad in the east. Given the increasing noise levels, this is probably an east coast project, anyway. John Andrews |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |