To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: SV: Re: Puckeridge test |
From: | "C Andersson" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 20 May 2000 14:59:27 +0200 |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
I worked Jim straight after you and found exactly the opposite..... 4dB better on the "small" antenna. Same thing here. Small antenna 3 dB better. /Christer sm6pxj |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: QRV on 136 and Puckeridge tests, john sexton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Puckeridge test 2, Dick Rollema |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: QRV on 136 and Puckeridge tests, john sexton |
Next by Thread: | LF: Puckeridge test 2, Dick Rollema |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |