Scott
I will give it some thought. I have worked VE7 es W6/W7 es
KL7 stations on 160metres CW over the years during the winter
months.
so like you say it is likely that it can be done on 500
and possibly 137.
If someone else beats me to the post so be it !!
On 160 metres the optimum time was coming up to my
sunrise. I have also worked on CW ZL es KH6 plus others in the
past.
My 160 antenna is 3/8 wave inv L up over 100 ft vertical
and my 600 metre antenna is 1/4 wave at the same height.
73 de mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 12:48
AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS
Mal when are you planning to test the path from G3 to
VE7? Surely you're not going to allow someone else to do it first
:-)
We await the viability of the path to be demonstrated at amateur
power levels.
As DCF39 becomes VERY audible at times (typically
best in Nov) it is possible that an amateur QRSS/DFCW signal could make it
over here...
GL
Scott
VE7TIL CN89dk
http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/
On
9/2/2011 10:20 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
You have just verified what I have always
said.
Yes keep an open mind and experiment but in the end
all will come to the same conclusion as Yourself.
QRSS/DFCW.
Over the years I have had a multitude of private
emails saying the same thing. We are not alone !!
de g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:48
AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS
On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
While it is interesting to experiment with
different modes
Mal is this really you?
I agree
with you on the QRSS/DFCW
comment!