Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: ROS

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: ROS
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 01:08:56 +0100
References: <001201cc6943$47f18e40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <008e01cc6994$8c75fa00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Scott
I will give it some thought. I have worked VE7 es W6/W7 es KL7 stations on 160metres CW over the years during the winter months.
so like you say it is likely that it can be done on 500 and possibly 137.
If someone else beats me to the post so be it !!
On 160 metres the optimum time was coming up to my sunrise. I have also worked on CW  ZL es KH6 plus others in the past.
My 160 antenna is 3/8 wave inv L up over 100 ft vertical and my 600 metre antenna is 1/4 wave at the same height.
73 de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

Mal when are you planning to test the path from G3 to VE7?  Surely you're not going to allow someone else to do it first :-)

We await the viability of the path to be demonstrated at amateur power levels. 

As DCF39 becomes VERY audible at times (typically best in Nov) it is possible that an amateur QRSS/DFCW signal could make it over here...

GL
Scott
VE7TIL CN89dk
http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/


On 9/2/2011 10:20 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
You have just verified what I have always said.
Yes keep an open mind and experiment but in the end all will come to the same conclusion as Yourself.
QRSS/DFCW.
Over the years I have had a multitude of private emails saying the same thing. We are not alone !!
de g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
While it is interesting to experiment with different modes
Mal is this really you?

I agree with you on the QRSS/DFCW comment!



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>