Re: LF: WOLF Again

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: WOLF Again
From:	"John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:59:04 -0400
Delivery-date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:48:10 +0100
Envelope-to:	[email protected]
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <002901c549c0$226b6820$4d01a8c0@JKA> <[email protected]> <003001c549c2$e4aeef40$4d01a8c0@JKA> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Markus,

Thanks for trying for the WOLF copy last night. Alan appears to have won the
15 watt prize, unless Hartmut manages to extract something from the noise!

Given the vagaries of fading, and the excellent conditions right now, I
don't think that I will stick with the QRP approach. Small miracles may be
possible, but they might prove difficult to reproduce.

XES will be back to 200 watts output tonight, with WOLF on 137.441 kHz,
starting at 2230 UTC.

John Andrews

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: WOLF Again, John Andrews Re: LF: WOLF Again, Hartmut Wolff Re: LF: WOLF Again, John Andrews Re: LF: WOLF Again, Hartmut Wolff Re: LF: WOLF Again, John Andrews Re: LF: WOLF Again, Joe Craig Re: LF: WOLF Again, Alan Melia Re: LF: WOLF Again, markusvester Re: LF: WOLF Again, John Andrews <= Re: LF: WOLF Again, Hartmut Wolff Re: LF: WOLF Again, Hartmut Wolff Re: LF: WOLF Again, Stewart Nelson LF: Re: WOLF Again, McAlevey

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: WOLF Again, markusvester
Next by Date:	Re: LF: WOLF Again, Hartmut Wolff
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: WOLF Again, markusvester
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: WOLF Again, Hartmut Wolff
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]