----- Original Message -----
From: "Michel F5WK" <[email protected] >
To: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Fw: TM0AST
Le lundi 20 juin 2005 à 18:08:34, [email protected] a écrit:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:hamilton mal
> To:[email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:08 PM
> Subject: TM0AST
> Hi All
> The callsign that I read was TM0AST and not TM5AST. Which is correct ??
> de G3KEV
>
In the hurry, I forgot to check out the call sign in the QRS buffer. The
good callsign is TM5AST. It's been corrected just after the beginning of
the qso with Jim. Sorry about that.
73 de Michel f5wk
--
The Bat 3.0.1.33
Tnx Michel for the info. It looks like I am the only one that read the
callsign as sent. There is too much guesswork on LF and some claiming QSO'S
in the past because they saw a mark on the frequency but got no proper ID.
You were a very strong signal with me on both my loop and vertical. I did
not have time for a QSO but maybe next time.
73 de Mal/G3KEV
| 