To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: RN6BN at 1625 UTC |
From: | "Vernall" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:29:08 +1200 |
References: | <000c01c420a4$e0c5c7c0$33e8fc3e@l8p8y6> <004001c42268$865e80e0$2102000a@ibm> <[email protected]> <004f01c422d6$beb9a640$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3> <009101c422dc$388c8820$20540150@captbrian> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Sam RN6BN, See attached the first appearance on my setup. It shows the very narrow shift. It also shows the first element of the R has somehow been clipped. The good initial copy from 1600 UTC suggests that propagation into ZL was available before then. However, there was significant fading towards the end of the first call sign sent, so it was not solid copy for all of the three hour test. 73, Bob |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: RN6BN, hamilton mal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: RN6BN O with 20 second dot, Vernall |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Path length, captbrian |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RN6BN at 1625 UTC, rn6bn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |