LF: Re: TA 3 March

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: TA 3 March

from [g3ldo]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: Re: TA 3 March
From:	"g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:05:40 -0000
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>


Hi John and Joe

I can report similar results to Joe's. The 0600-0700 period was best,

though DRP was visible in pieces overnight.

Thanks for the reports. I was asked by KL1X to QSY from 137.773.4 because of
a noise band on that frequency. As I can only move in 1Hz steps (at the
moment) I went to 137.774.4, just below CT1DRP's frequency.
CT1DRP is very consistant here, and judging by the stateside captures, is
the same over there.

Peter G3LDO

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: TA 3 March, Joe Craig LF: Re: TA 3 March, John Andrews LF: Re: TA 3 March, g3ldo <= LF: TA 4 March, John Andrews Re: LF: TA 4 March, Jay Rusgrove Re: LF: TA 4 March, Joe Craig Re: LF: TA 4 March, John Andrews Re: LF: TA 4 March, Jay Rusgrove

Previous by Date:	LF: 73 KHz activity., Ian Kyle
Next by Date:	LF: RE: Re: 73kHz, John W Gould
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: TA 3 March, John Andrews
Next by Thread:	LF: TA 4 March, John Andrews
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]