Re: LF: Another weak sig

["Vernall" <vernall@xtra.co.nz>]

Thanks to Markus for the analysis.

 

73, Bob

----- Original Message -----

From: MarkusVester@aol.com

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:05 AM

Subject: Re: LF: Another weak sig

Dear Bob and Teo,

you did it again:
http://members.aol.com/df6nm2/Eu-zl2ca_7Apr05_overlay.gif (74kB, 30s/10.5mHz).

Bob received the first "AR" at 16:50...17:13, and then 18:12...18:22, near the end of the capture. Apparently the path was already open when Teo started transmitting.

In the overlayed image I can vaguely see a few brighter noise pixels during Laurie's "Q" at 19:04...19:11, which would have been inconspicuous in the Argo capture alone.

And good luck for tomorrow's eclipse experiment - see also DF3LP's 75-kHz observation on 11 Aug 1999: http://www.qsl.net/df3lp/projects/eclipse/index.html

73 de Markus, DF6NM


In einer eMail vom 07.04.2005 22:17:22 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt vernall@xtra.co.nz:

Hi all,

Another weak signal here this morning, close to 135.922 kHz.  Argo pic sent
to Markus for analysis.

Nothing received from North America (I have a substantial land foreground to
NA compared to Mike ZL4OL, but I am nearer the sea for directions towards
EU).

73, Bob ZL2CA