Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Re: LF: ZL DX testing 21 September (was 22 September)

from [Larry Kayser] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Re: LF: ZL DX testing 21 September (was 22 September)
From: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:44:06 -0400
References: <965803.997454577531.JavaMail.computernetworks@gomailjtp01> <000301c121de$e47f7860$7cb21bca@xtr743187>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]> 
Bob:


Looking further ahead, if we can get our permits amended to transmit

around

136 kHz, are there any suggestions as to what spot frequencies are

suitable?

Respectfully request you avoid 136.6 to 137.4, which is occupied by CFH +
sideband noise when they are on.

If you come above about 136.1, I will have to stop transmitting while I
listen.

NPG, I think in California was a major signal some time back, early 2000, I
do not remember the frequency.

Larry
VA3LK
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Re: LF: ZL DX testing 21 September (was 22 September), Vernall
Next by Date:  LF: Picture of ZL band in EU, Brian Rogerson
Previous by Thread:  Re: Re: LF: ZL DX testing 21 September (was 22 September), Vernall
Next by Thread:  LF: Picture of ZL band in EU, Brian Rogerson
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]