To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: ZL6QH 136 tests |
From: | "mike.dennison" <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com> |
Date: | Sun, 4 Nov 2001 09:10:10 -0000 |
References: | <5.0.2.1.2.20011004082609.00a1f080@mail.pncl.co.uk> <001501c164e4$68bca880$94b51bca@rvernall> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | <majordom@post.thorcom.com> |
The preference is for ZL6QH to transmit near the top of the band, with 120 second dots, 0.4 Hz shift DFCW, so the frequencies would be 137.7900 and 137.7896 kHz, with stability of better than 0.1 Hz. Those frequencies are just a little above those used by VA3LK. Are there any comments from European potential listeners as to viability of the nominated frequencies? 73, Bob ZL2CA Bob, In Western Eu we have a nasty 'Luxemburg effect' that produces broadcast intermods at the very top of the band. I think you would be better using something like 137.600. It depends, of course, on the time of day you will be operating. Mike, G3XDV |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re. ZL6QH 136 tests, Laurie Mayhead |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: spectrum 136kHz I2PHD/dj8wx, jannsen |
Previous by Thread: | LF: ZL6QH 136 tests, Vernall |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: ZL6QH 136 tests, Marco Bruno IK1ODO |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |