To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: RE: 600 V 160 |
From: | "John W Gould" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:38:20 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <000701c7e00c$d96bf9b0$15e4fc3e@g3kev> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Mal et al, it will be an interesting comparison, but it will be the ERP (estimated or otherwise) that will be important, as well as some absolute measurement of the noise floor on each band. Incidentally, has anyone done some noise floor measurements on 136kHz now that the Rugby LORAN has gone? 73 John, G3WKL |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: conditions 137KHz, Laurence KL1X |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: 600 V 160, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 600 V 160, hamilton mal |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: 600 V 160, Dave Sergeant |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |