Hello Joe,
Data from some key eclipse receivers is being processed; using data from
good receivers in Kansas and Delaware, analysts did not find your 18:00 UT
137.777 kHz signal on their first try using 1-second integration time; could
you recommend a better integration time for those two receiver locations?
Thanks!
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 5:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: LF: RE: Re: Eclipse Experiment
My pleasure, Jim.
The carrier was switched off at 0935 this morning.
73
Joe VO1NA
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017, [email protected] wrote:
> Thanks Joe,
>
> Lots of receivers listening.
>
> 73,
>
> Jim AA5BW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 12:34 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: Eclipse Experiment
>
> Transmitting a carrier on 137.777 kHz +- a few ppb 4 Amps to the
> 10x100m RL for the next 1.5 days or until something fails.
>
> 73
> Joe VO1NA
>
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2017, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Unofficial EclipseMob update:
>>
>> Dixon will warm up starting ~ 06:45 Pacific Time, ramping ERP to ~
>> 1-2 kW
> at 55.500 kHz and ~ 3-4 kW at 135.950 kHz by 07:30 Pacific Time,
> broadcasting MSK 101010..., until one or two hours after East Coast
> totality.
>> Dixon frequency may wander slightly.
>> Comparing Dixon signal to WWVB signal could be interesting.
>>
>> Dixon 55.500 kHz signal field strength could be ~ 40 fT in Forest, VA
>>
>> A 137 kHz signal from VO1NA, or Warren, or an LF or VLF signal from
>> W4DEX
> might be captured and saved by a record number of receivers, and put
> to good use.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Jim AA5BW
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter
>> Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 1:00 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: LF: Re: Eclipse Experiment
>>
>> Hi Jim et al.
>>
>> On 16.07.2017 15:18, Jim wrote:
>>> ...
>>> (b) any before/during/after data from stable receivers ...
>>
>> There is a slight chance to observe effects via the propagation paths
>> from
> NAU, NAA or NML to Europe. Especially NAU looks promising since the
> C-flare from 2017-07-15, ~1940 utc, could be observed quite well here.
>> http://lf-radio.de/cgi-bin/test/plot_channel.cgi?date=17-07-15&freq=4
>> 0
>> .7KHz
>>
>> Good luck to all EclipseMob members!
>>
>> 73 de df3lp,
>> Peter
>>
>> PS: chart from 1999-08-11 eclipse:
>> http://www.qsl.net/df3lp/projects/eclipse/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
|