Further to Jims doubles, noted earlier
today:-
2010-03-25
10:16 G3ZJO 0.503821 -2 0 IO92ng 0.05 G3KAN IO92nj 14 0
2010-03-25
10:16 G3ZJO 0.503871 -25 0 IO92ng 0.05 G3KAN IO92nj 14 0
= +50Hz
Were there some 50Hz spaced carriers about
today?
2010-03-25
16:54 7D0LX 0.503937 -32 -3 PG92 0.005 M0BMU IO91vr 15691 320
7D0LX – G4JNT = 63
2010-03-25
16:54 7D0LX 0.503813 -18 -3 PG92 0.005 M0BMU IO91vr 15691 320
f = G4JNT* -150Hz
2010-03-25 16:54 G4JNT * 0.503963 -31 0 IO90iv 0.2
M0BMU IO91vr 119 39 100Hz
–63 = 37
2010-03-25
17:00 G4JNT 0.503874 0 0 IO90iv 0.2 M0BMU IO91vr 119 39
The real JNT which didn’t appear at 16.54.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of g3zjo
Sent: 25
March 2010 18:58
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: RE: Interesting False
WSPR Decode
Jim has been
playing doubles today with real signals too.
2010-03-25 17:36 G3ZJO 0.503820 -17 -2 IO92ng +17 0.050 M0BMU IO91vr 76 47
2010-03-25 17:36 G3ZJO 0.503989 -33 -2 IO92ng +17 0.050 M0BMU IO91vr 76 47
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andy Talbot
Sent: 25
March 2010 17:06
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Interesting False
WSPR Decode
How did you manage
this? Never seen one like it before.
A false WSPR decode, but
the identical message appearing twice, 124 Hz apart.
Must have been an
interesting burst of pulsed WB interference to generate in.
|
2010-03-25 16:54
|
7D0LX
|
0.503937
|
-32
|
-3
|
PG92
|
+7
|
0.005
|
M0BMU
|
IO91vr
|
15691
|
9750
|
|
2010-03-25 16:54
|
7D0LX
|
0.503813
|
-18
|
-3
|
PG92
|
+7
|
0.005
|
M0BMU
|
IO91vr
|
15691
|
9750
|
Andy
www.g4jnt.com
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2768 - Release Date: 03/24/10 19:33:00
