To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: Related Technical Query - Soundcard calibrator |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:17:28 -0000 |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <001901c3c00d$5c321600$045bfea9@RSGB613192> |
Organization: | University of Hertfordshire |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Dear Andy, LF Group I hate to throw a spanner in the works, but... A noise source of exactly this type is discussed in Horowitz & Hill "The Art of Electronics" 2nd ed., section 9.34. This gives the formula (in the form Andy has used) Vrms^2 = Vpk^2 * 2 * BW /Fclock, (giving 224mV rms) which is different by a factor of sqrt(pi) from the value Andy gets. I spent some time last night trying to figure out which one is correct, and came out with a reasonably convincing case for Horowitz & Hill's formula - if anyone is interested, I will put it into an e-mail compatible form Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Schematic capture software, Hugh M0WYE |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: Related Technical Query - Soundcard calibrator, Andy talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Related Technical Query - Soundcard calibrator, Andy talbot |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Related Technical Query - Soundcard calibrator, Stewart Nelson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |