The mystery deepens, On 08/04/2012 13:37, Markus Vester wrote: Assuming both were instances are samplerate locked, this disproves a possible detection. Of course all my Speclab instances are locked,
Hello Marco and Eddie, The problem is solved. Thanks to Herbert, DG3MDE who showed me what was wrong. Internet Explorer seems to ignore the mistake and displays the site correctly anyway. Wrong: <P a
Hi Eddie, I don't think this is my signal. The DFCW shift is 3 mHz, so my upper frequency is 8969.98150 Hz. BTW my FFT and scroll rate settings are the same as used in the typical DFCW-6000 SL instan
Hi Marcus Stefan doesn't seem to be around today he has lots of replies to send to my direct e-mails re ELF / ULF tests :-) His Grabber seems to be frozen at 07:54 and I couldn't establish the freque
Hi Eddie, Am 09.04.2012 09:44, schrieb qrss: When ever I look at your second Grabber it is dead, like NOW, so I didn't look to compare, and I was in the garden planting out so as to catch this lovely
PS: Eddie, my experimental CDF VLF grabber is locked to GQD/22.1 kHz. You know the waves sometimes become terminated so the S/N of that reference may be to weak sometimes. So there may be some phase
VLF, The last nights test was successfully done without phase glitches in DFCW-600 for many hours, see http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/VLF/600RDF.jpg I did some changes on the LOPT PA, thuis the int
Hi Eddie, Stefan, this looks interesting. Accounting for your grabber timescale being an hour ahead of UT, your right dash is centered approximately at 6:30 UT. This would indeed coincide with the fi
Stefan There is a common start / finish minute on the dots in the att.capture.HH.m3 to the best of my measurement ability, they certainly coincide with your TX periods. 73 Eddie G3ZJO Grabber:- http:
Hi Alan, Thanks for the nice words and your point of view. I can totally agree. Yes i also remember the discussions about the possibilities on < 9 kHz. Now we even learned that not even a kite antenn
PS: the images are quite large. They are optimal in a >= 22'' monitor. But when you use a small netbook, for example, i.e. a 1024x600 monitor, just press "ctrl" + "-" to reduce the display size. Then
Gerhard, the lack of background can be compensated by the open mind that often goes with it. 73, Rik ON7YD ________________________________________ Van: [email protected] [owner-rsgb
Hi Gerhard, Yes, of course. I just meant the "official" researchers who do that work as their job to earn money and (have to) publish their work on conferences and in various papers. For them it is i
Stefan ! I think WE ARE researchers in some way. Maybe not all of us do have the theoretical background which is "necessary" do to "real" research (whatever that means) but sometimes I think this cou
Hello Stefan, all. going on! I am in Darmstadt for some days and the small VLF generator generates range of a few uW, probably close to 1 uW. But i will QRO soon.Anyway, days i will change to real DF
HiStefan I did see your second Grabber when you first put put the multi colour on it but every time since you have a nice page but no captures. I am running Firefox, just tried the link again, those
Hi Stephan, Gerhard, I have an approach that says " If its new to you its 'research' " Lots of usefull stuff has been learned by repeating old observations in the light of new information and with ne
Hi Stefan My fault on the frequency, I must pay more attention, you are generating with SpecLab and you did say The QRG is centered at 8969.98000 Hz. The DFCW shift is 3 mHz. To be pedantic that is D
Hi Peter, Thanks for the grabber! No one detected this signal so far, not even Paul Nicholson. I promise to rise the signal at least 20 dB very soon again. All pretests are satisfying. 73, Stefan/DK7
