Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+Ground\s+loop\s+improvements\s+and\s+test\s+carrier\.\.\.\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 12:14:48 +0200
Hi VLF, Last weekend i improved my ground loop antenna by increasing its length from 900m to 1130m, i.e. +25 % of length, which should give about 2 dB more signal from the same antenna current. This
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00020.html (10,229 bytes)

2. Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 16:00:36 +0000
Received here - 900m Ant: T2019-03-31_13:58,+10m: 1.07fT S/N -10.4dB/1Hz 1130m Ant: T2019-03-31_14:12,+10m: 1.30fT S/N -7.6dB/1Hz The signal strength hasn't increased as much as the area has increase
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00021.html (9,274 bytes)

3. Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 20:10:52 +0200
Hello Paul, Thank you. Interesting. For you the difference is 2.8 dB. But the loop points almost fully into your direction. The angle turned from 6 deg to 3 deg, ie. a theoretical gain of G = 20 lg(c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00022.html (11,101 bytes)

4. Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 20:24:16 +0200
PS: Earlier that day, the same test was done at 5170.1 Hz. But there, the antenna current was different: 900m: T2019-03-31_12:31,+19m at I = 2.74 A 1130m: T2019-03-31_12:57,+31m at I = 2.12 A i.e. th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00023.html (17,476 bytes)

5. Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:57:18 +0000
Received - 900m: T2019-03-31_12:31,+19m at I = 2.74 A: 0.50fT S/N -6.74dB/1Hz 1130m: T2019-03-31_12:57,+31m at I = 2.12 A: 0.51fT S/N -8.22dB/1Hz So 0.51/0.50 = 1.02 and 1130/900 * 2.12/2.74 = 0.97 s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00024.html (10,429 bytes)

6. Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 21:37:57 +0200
RR, but for the 2.12 A i needed 415 W TX power and for 2.74 A i needed 515 W. So there is still an improvement of 10 * lg(515/415) = 0.94 dB. Further improvements planned... Tnx & 73, Stefan Received
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00025.html (10,389 bytes)

7. Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 14:36:44 +0000 (UTC)
At DL0AO, we produced spectrograms and plots during the 5.17 kHz test last weekend. During the first session with the shorter guiderail antenna, signficant fading and a dip occured, most pronounced o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00035.html (12,098 bytes)

8. Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 18:14:39 +0200
Hello Markus, VLF, ULF, Thanks for the todays tests and the good cooperation. Amazing what we can do meanwhile, watching smaller variations of the signal levels, which would not be possible from my l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00036.html (12,996 bytes)

9. Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:06:34 +0000
Received at 5170.1 Hz, 2019-04-05_10:39,+35m: 1130m, I=2,39 A, 0.63 fT S/N -5.07 dB/1Hz 2019-04-05_11:19,+51m: 900m, I=2,92 A, 0.63 fT S/N -4.92 dB/1Hz Yes, the same fT in both tests. Then we have 90
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00037.html (10,725 bytes)

10. Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 14:02:42 +0200
Hi Paul, Thanks for your measurements. Good idea to calculate B relative to I. Would be interesting to see how this varies with frequency. BTW i did now actually order one of those: https://www.dhgat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00038.html (12,237 bytes)

11. Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 18:32:29 +0000 (UTC)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00040.html (13,758 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu