Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+DL3NDR\s+at\s+8270\.0010\s+Hz\?\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+DL3NDR\s+at\s+8270\.0010\s+Hz\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: DL3NDR at 8270.0010 Hz? (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:41:38 +0200; Hi VLF, I can see a stable trace at exactly 8270.0010 Hz. It is relatively long, must be more then 24 hours. I bet it is man-made (OM-made!). Is it DL3NDR? If so, the antenna current or antenna effic; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00376.html (8,800 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: DL3NDR at 8270.0010 Hz? (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:20:44 +0000; Looks like there's something there, but nothing showing on Markus' receiver http://www.df6nm.darc.de/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm I'll take a look here in narrow bandwidth. It would be very nice to receive mor; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00377.html (8,725 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: DL3NDR at 8270.0010 Hz? (score: 1): Author: Roland Bruestle <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:50:12 +0200; Hello Stefan, I assume that's me. There ar about 370Veff on the coil. If I increase the voltage I will get problems. The best would be if I improve the antenna. The antenna is now horizontal 50m and; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00380.html (9,430 bytes)
4. Re: VLF: DL3NDR at 8270.0010 Hz? (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:15:54 +0200; Hello Roland, Thanks for the feedback. Yes, adding a second wire to the antenna is certainly a good decision. But more height is better then more wire in a lower height. So if you have 50m up in 14m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00382.html (10,294 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]