Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+DJ8WX\s+8270\.004\s+Hz\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RE: VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:43:28 -0900
Ive turned my 8270 to super-slow/large FFT in hoping to see a Blurr :-) Laurence KL7L Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:22:31 +0100 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00466.html (11,508 bytes)

2. Re: VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 14:26:17 +0100
Hi Uwe, umm..  "PPS zero-crossing too flat" was mumbo-jumbo from the software debugging phase. The reason may just be as simple as "there was no pulse-per-second sync signal from the GPS" at all. I h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00810.html (24,964 bytes)

3. Re: VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:17:42 +0100
Hi Uwe, Wolf, maybe the tomcat only tried to eat the mouse, as cat's sometimes do. But there is another eerie possibility: he may have upset it intentionally. After letting Uwe just key the transmitt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00811.html (14,318 bytes)

4. Re: VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:10:47 +0000
On 19/01/2014 12:18, Markus Vester wrote: Attached are four stacked spectrograms of Uwe's signal as received by Paul Nicholson, DF6NM, OK2BVG and PA1SDB (top to bottom), scaled to the same time and s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00812.html (12,425 bytes)

5. Re: VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 22:56:44 +0100
Hi Markus, just now reading your mail. the switch off time was some min after you sent it.. sri for that. now the TX will stay on the air until tomorrow abt 0900utc. Hopefully Mal reads this. GL Uwe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00813.html (11,337 bytes)

6. Re: VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:01:32 +0100
Hi Uwe, great signal here, better than ever! On my grabber http://www.df6nm.de/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm it's well visible in 478 uHz, and even traces in the 3.8 mHz "600" window during the early morning ho
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00814.html (14,687 bytes)

7. Re: VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:34:42 +0100
Hello Uwe, Markus, VLF ! I just took a "look back in time" in my 2012 and 2013 log's (www.qsl.net/pa1sdb) and I think over the last two years there is a large rise in signal level when I take a look
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00815.html (16,890 bytes)

8. VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:36:42 +0100
Uwe is again producing very good traces on the European grabbers. Even in my noisy location I am now getting a nice peak in the 42 uHz FFT (slightly higher due to an uncorrected 0.25 mHz error in my
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00830.html (10,690 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu