Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+Carrier\s+on\s+3675\.005\s+Hz\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:56:30 +0200
Hi VLF, I'm back from LF for a while and built up my large VLF coil which was used on 2970 Hz in the beginning of the year. Actually it is under maintenance, one of the six stacks has to be replaced.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-07/msg00167.html (9,464 bytes)

2. Re: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 11:15:35 +0200
VLF, After nearly 8 days the carrier is still on the air without an interruption, despite occasional thunderstorms :-) It looks like the SNR is suffering by summer QRN, as expected. The stable carrie
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00020.html (12,914 bytes)

3. Re: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 08:35:00 -0400
Yes the signal is definitely making it to Amberg! This is a fine result of mutual collaboration: Stefan DK7FC erecting the transmit facility and posing the low frequency challenge, the DL0AO team (sp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00024.html (14,428 bytes)

4. RE: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 14:57:22 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00025.html (19,786 bytes)

5. Re: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 21:38:02 +0200
Hello Jim! Am 05.08.2017 20:57, schrieb : Congratulations Stefan, Markus and DL0AO team!   Is this the first far-field link between 3.000 kHz and 4.000 kHz? Yes it is, as far as i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00026.html (22,701 bytes)

6. Re: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 22:07:56 +0200
Hi Markus, VLF, The carrier is quite stable now. The QRN has been a bit lower today and yesterday. Maybe the worst days regarding QRN are over now? I'm curious to try sending an EbNaut message but no
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00027.html (15,895 bytes)

7. Re: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 15:31:25 +0000
Here's the best I've got so far, using the daytime signal http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170808a.gif Not a significant signal but we could take it as a hint that something is there. This is H-field only,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00033.html (11,773 bytes)

8. Re: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 22:23:22 +0200
Hi Paul, Thanks for the image and efforts. And for the advice on vlfrx tools. It will take some time to apply all that. Without the E field (on your side) we may loose a few dB these days i guess. Se
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00036.html (11,998 bytes)

9. Re: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 13:39:42 +0000
I'm measuring about 0.016 fT daytime, 0.045 fT nighttime. Daytime signal phase leads the night phase by about 67 degrees. Combining and normalising day/night signals and excluding the terminator peri
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00038.html (13,068 bytes)

10. Re: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 16:02:00 +0200
Hi Paul, Am 09.08.2017 15:39, schrieb Paul Nicholson: I'm measuring about 0.016 fT daytime, 0.045 fT nighttime. Daytime signal phase leads the night phase by about 67 degrees. Combining and normalisi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00039.html (12,830 bytes)

11. Re: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 13:00:29 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00041.html (13,020 bytes)

12. Re: VLF: Carrier on 3675.005 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:30:42 +0000
I made a change today, now the difference is worse, 0.22 dB. This is typical, two steps forward and one step backwards. If I didn't have two independent receivers running side by side, I wouldn't be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-08/msg00049.html (12,062 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu