Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ULF\:\s+New\s+carrier\s+near\s+2970\s+Hz\.\.\.\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:28:44 +0100
Hi ULF, Since 16:56 UTC  i'm running 180 mA antenna current on (2970 + 7/(24*3600)) Hz, i.e. on 2970.000081 Hz With integer multiples of 1/(24*3600 sec), phase glitches at 0 UTC should be avoided (ho
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00067.html (11,726 bytes)

2. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:46:25 +0100
Hi Paul, I'm curious, is there any sign of a peak since the beginning of my transmission? The average antenna current is higher than last time. On the spectrogram of Renato i see that the QRN on 2970
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00114.html (13,592 bytes)

3. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:42:50 +0000
This evening after work, I will check. Right now the recording files are transferring onto my fast workstation so I can quickly try a range of settings. I'm happy to be looking at 2970 again, it is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00115.html (12,035 bytes)

4. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:57:17 +0100
...it could be interesting to separate the days from the nights. If we know when the phase changes from night to day and from day to night, you could add a phase offset to the daytime signal. A serie
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00116.html (12,263 bytes)

5. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 20:38:29 +0000
So far, still not a trace here. Noise floor down to 0.007 fT in 1.6uHz (about 6 fT in 1Hz) after sferic blanking. Days, nights, days + nights, with various phase adjustments for night. Coherent and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00135.html (12,353 bytes)

6. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 14:15:30 +0100 (CET)
Noise floor down to 0.007 fT in 1.6uHz (about 6 fT in 1Hz) after sferic blanking. what blanking settings did you find to be the best on 2970Hz? jacek
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00136.html (11,831 bytes)

7. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:02:51 +0000
Well, now perhaps a hint of a signal. Only 3 sigma so not much but is interesting because it's on the right frequency and only present in E/W loop and E-field. I gave up doing long narrow integration
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00149.html (13,390 bytes)

8. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:47:27 +0100
Hi Paul, ULF, Sorry for my late reply. The transmission takes quite long, so there is no need to stress with my answer :-) Thanks for the overview of the signal received in Bielefeld. Quite strong an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00152.html (17,439 bytes)

9. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:27:02 +0100 (CET)
Paul, what noiseblanker settings did you find to be the best on 2970Hz? jacek
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00153.html (11,723 bytes)

10. RE: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:58:52 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00154.html (18,894 bytes)

11. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 20:15:41 +0000
I've been trying a range of settings. I reverted back to simple (daytime) options vtfilter -ath=5,bw=1 -h bp,f=3370,w=1000 | vtblank -a25 -d0 -t100 -v (using vtblank from the latest version v0.8 of v
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00155.html (15,272 bytes)

12. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 20:48:13 +0000
Ok, this is 3.9 sigma http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170321b.gif It's there from about 11:00 to 22:00 but it doesn't resolve so well in any bandwidth narrower than about 50uHz. I'm going to start droppin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00156.html (13,209 bytes)

13. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 22:06:53 +0000
Here's the best I can do for tonight. Now at 4.4 sigma with http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170321c.gif S/N 12.8 dB in 55 uHz. I dropped out the 15th and 17th, each of these days make the sum worse. But d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00158.html (13,749 bytes)

14. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:22:50 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00159.html (12,300 bytes)

15. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:22:38 +0000
Looks promising doesn't it? It can probably be improved: the blanker and filter settings are just a reasonable guess, not likely to be optimum. This apparent 14:00 to 19:00 'window' might just be bec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00160.html (12,339 bytes)

16. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:05:55 +0100
Hi Paul, ULF, Wow, just amazing! Can't we say we already made it? Isn't it extremely unlikely that this is something elso than my signal?? A first signal detection by amateurs on the 101 km band betw
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00164.html (16,412 bytes)

17. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:25:35 +0000
Well I don't know. It would be an extraordinary achievement for your 2970 signal to reach this far. It needs a result that can stand up to scrutiny. I'd like to do some more work with it to get an un
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00172.html (13,930 bytes)

18. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:15:14 +0100
Hi Paul, Interesting. Do you also use the noise normalisation function which proved to be useful in recent stackings on 5170 Hz? Still a few weeks before the 6 channel input soundcard for the Raspi a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00176.html (14,478 bytes)

19. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:32:13 +0000
Yes and it makes a small improvement to the 2970 peak. I won't be buying one until the first revision, after they've got the bugs worked out. It's a bit too pricey to take a gamble. -- Paul Nicholso
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00177.html (13,397 bytes)

20. RE: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:52:21 -0400
Geomagnetic K-index elevated March 21 through March 23, approximately 3 < Kp < 4 but higher in Europe with levels at Wingst and Niemegk varying by 50nT to 80nT at times during that period. Mentioning
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00185.html (15,244 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu