Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ULF\:\s+EbNaut\s+transmissions\s+on\s+lower\s+frequencies\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ULF\:\s+EbNaut\s+transmissions\s+on\s+lower\s+frequencies\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. ULF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies? (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 14:55:49 +0200; Hi ULF, Am 28.04.2016 20:28, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Stefan, want to try EbNaut at a lower frequency? That would be a good challenge. 6kHz perhaps? Paul, maybe you are right! We don't know so much ab; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-05/msg00008.html (11,824 bytes)
2. Re: ULF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies? (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 14:06:34 +0000; Amateur radio DX at ULF, that would be a result for any dreamer wouldn't it? You've proved that propagation will allow 24hrs at 8.27kHz, and we expect most lower frequencies will be at least as stabl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-05/msg00009.html (10,679 bytes)
3. Re: ULF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies? (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 16:33:16 +0200; RR, OK! Do we know enough about the phase behaviour on 8.27 kHz, so we know where we are starting from? For ULF we would need longer symbol periods, that's sure. So it could be interesting first to t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-05/msg00010.html (12,372 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]