Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ULF\:\s+EbNaut\s+message\s+attempt\s+at\s+829\.9\s+Hz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ULF\:\s+EbNaut\s+message\s+attempt\s+at\s+829\.9\s+Hz\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. ULF: EbNaut message attempt at 829.9 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 13:28:42 +0200; Dear ULF friends, Since 11 UTC, i'm attempting to transfer an EbNaut message into the far field at 829.9 Hz. The antenna current is 1.83 A, blown into my 900m spaced earth electrode antenna. TX power; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00205.html (10,091 bytes)
2. Re: ULF: EbNaut message attempt at 829.9 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 15:36:24 +0100; ULF, ...post-processing completed. It was a rather noisy day, which required different blanker and antenna mixing settings. At first i used the same settings like in the recent message at 970 Hz and; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00213.html (11,748 bytes)
3. RE: ULF: EbNaut message attempt at 829.9 Hz (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 11:33:26 -0400; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00215.html (15,378 bytes)
4. Re: ULF: EbNaut message attempt at 829.9 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 17:27:38 +0100; Hi Jim, thanks for the discussion. Well, i often see on my VLF RDF wideband window (click 3 times on the top window shown on http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html ) th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00217.html (18,656 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]