Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ULF\:\s+Carrier\s+on\s+2970\.01\s+Hz\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 12:38:04 +0100
Hi ULF, The accu is fully recharged and i am on the hill again, transmitting on the ground loop antenna. This time, the accu has even more power. The TX power is 520 W (!), the DC measurement tells i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00599.html (10,730 bytes)

2. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 07:16:22 -0500
Stefan Nice signal at DL0AO grabber! Jay W1VD -- Original Message -- From: DK7FC <[email protected]> Reply-To: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: 12/30/2018
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00600.html (11,519 bytes)

3. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 12:24:23 +0000 (UTC)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00601.html (9,504 bytes)

4. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 16:59:54 +0100
Hello Markus, ULF, The carrier was stopped after 2 hours (13:17 UTC). What a great result! Again i did not expect such a S/N in 424 uHz at DL0AO. The QRB is 283 km, http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=KO02MD&
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00605.html (12,457 bytes)

5. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:40:11 +0100
Am 30.12.2018 16:59, schrieb DK7FC: The QRB is 283 km, http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=KO02MD&from=JN39WI Wrong link. The correct link is http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=JN59VK&from=JN39WI 73, Stefan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00609.html (9,607 bytes)

6. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:45:43 +0100 (CET)
Ufortunately i didn't receive anything here. Not very exciting but i believe that negative results should also be reported. The spectrograms: https://klubnl.pl/grabber/grabber_sq5bpf_2970.png https:/
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00614.html (12,223 bytes)

7. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 22:15:04 +0100
Hello Jacek, Did you just look into a spectrogram or did you try to produce a spectrum peak from your data storage? Do you use the -a th=x function in vtfilter. I think i have the latest version of v
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00615.html (13,946 bytes)

8. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 23:40:22 +0000
Best I can manage here is 11.9 dB S/N in 139uHz from the 9nV/m E-field signal. A little over 2 electrons on the antenna. http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/181230a.gif The pipeline uses vtfilter -h bp,f=2470
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00617.html (12,022 bytes)

9. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 11:11:14 +0100
Hello Paul, ULF, Thanks for the efforts. 11.9 dB, that sounds good. For a valid detection you said we need 14 dB SNR. Anyway, quite close and it is unlikely that it is a noise peak. Actually this is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00624.html (14,489 bytes)

10. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 12:41:44 +0000
I forgot to allow for the rx calibration, the signal was closer to 12nV/m rather than 9nv/m. You might not do very well on Renato's receiver, is has been suffering a high level of interference recent
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00625.html (11,514 bytes)

11. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 10:33:02 +0100 (CET)
This is the best i can do so far. Using vlfrx-tools 0.9f and vtfilter -a th=5 -h hp,f=1750,poles=8 -h lp,f=4250,poles=8 | vtblank -a25 -d0.005 -t1000 Does that count as a reception? VY 73 es HNY Jace
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00012.html (12,161 bytes)

12. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:01:24 +0000 (UTC)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00013.html (14,913 bytes)

13. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 12:09:37 +0100
Hi Jacek, Are you sure the x-axis label is correct? In vtblank, you use -t1000, not -t100 ? You need to determine the carrier S/N. I usually take an EbNaut message having the same length, containing
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00014.html (14,024 bytes)

14. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:07:56 +0100 (CET)
Thanks Markus You're right! This is a nice example how one can make a false result. I will re-run the tests this evening. VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF On Wed, 2 Jan 2019, Markus Vester wrote: Date: Wed, 2 Ja
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00018.html (12,831 bytes)

15. Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 22:59:20 +0100 (CET)
Hi Stefan Unfortunately no detection on 2470 and 2970 (especially after Markus noticed that i'm trying to receive the wrong frequency :). Could you try 5170 and 6470Hz? VY 73 ES HNY 2019 Jacek / SQ5B
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00045.html (14,461 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu