Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Testing\s+JT9\-1\s+on\s+LF\:\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Testing\s+JT9\-1\s+on\s+LF\:\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Testing JT9-1 on LF: (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:58:04 +0100; Hi Stefan, thank you very much for the fine JT9-1 QSO! All decoded, QRO as well as QRP, even partial slots. Best 73, Markus 1916 10 4 1.4 1940. 0.0 DF6NM DK7FC -03 1918 10 -2 1.5 1940. 0.0 DF6NM DK7F; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00021.html (14,268 bytes)
2. Testing JT9-1 on LF: (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:07:14 +0100; Now sending a few rounds of JT9-1 on 137.43 kHz, and I'm looking forward to possible reports and over-the-air replies. Best 73, Markus (DF6NM); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00321.html (9,672 bytes)
3. Re: Testing JT9-1 on LF: (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 08:16:30 -0500 (EST); Hi Joe, my fault... initially I didn't have the NTP software running. When I started it in the middle of the QSO it corrected a 1.5 second clock error. This unintended experiment confirms that JT9 v0; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00357.html (13,379 bytes)
4. Re: Testing JT9-1 on LF: (score: 1): Author: Joe Taylor <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:36:49 -0500; Hi Markus, Stefan, and all, It appears that you have things working reasonably well in JT9-1. Here are the decodes Markus received from Stefan: UTC Sync dB DT Freq Drift Message -- 1916 10 4 1.4 1940; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00399.html (11,201 bytes)
5. Re: Testing JT9-1 on LF: (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:12:03 +0100; Markus, Joe, LF, Thanks for the FB funny QSO in JT-1 I got nearly 80% copy of the QSO, even my own transmissions were decoded. The +18 dB SNR you sent me sound readonable. This is what i got: 1914 0; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00718.html (14,975 bytes)
6. Re: Testing JT9-1 on LF: (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:49:01 +0100; Hello Joe, Am 16.11.2012 21:36, schrieb Joe Taylor: Hi Markus, Stefan, and all, It appears that you have things working reasonably well in JT9-1. Here are the decodes Markus received from Stefan: UTC; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00881.html (12,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]