..in italian slang: Ciumbia! :-) Well done Stefan, Alex and all LF folks! 73 F/IK1HSS Crikey, that's almost into Kazakhstan! Over a land path! From a base station antenna! And with over 5dB to spare!
Yes, a strong signal here and perfect decode of the 3 chars: H-field E-field E+H field 7th/8th 10.5 dB 99.8 deg 9.0 dB 107.3 deg 12.5 dB 103.3 deg 8th/9th 14.1 dB 88.3 deg 12.5 dB 93.8 deg 17.3 dB 90
Yes, a strong signal here and perfect decode of the 3 chars: H-field E-field E+H field 7th/8th 10.5 dB 99.8 deg 9.0 dB 107.3 deg 12.5 dB 103.3 deg 8th/9th 1
Thanks Paul, good to see. I tried various time and frequency offsets for the wav file from last night and for the stacked file from the last two nights. No result. Now i started two SpecLab instances
Hi Domenico, Thanks for your continued interest in the very low frequencies :-) Are you using vttime to correct the sample rate? Or are you doing it in SpecLab? The Alpha trace looks maybe a bit unst
I have a little shell script to do the stacking, which I've attached. First, extract each transmission in the usual way, eg something like vtread -T2017-11-07_15:58,+45360 /raw | vtcat -p | vtfilter
Hi Domenico, Thanks for your continued interest in the very low frequencies :-) Are you using vttime to correct the sample rate? Or are you doing it in SpecLab? The Alpha trace looks maybe a bit uns
Hi Domenico, The unmodulated carrier is now on, 8270.0075 Hz phase stabilised since ~1800 utc today. I'll let you know the parameters when the next EbNaut transmission takes place. 73 & GL Joe VO1NA
Hi Stefan, your recent messages were also successfully decoded at DF6NM (E-field) and DL0AO (west cardioid): date msg df6nm dl0ao Nov. dB dB 5-6 R 13.2 12.0 6-7 73 10.4 9.4 7-8 xxx 1.6 7.5 8-9 xxx 10
Hi Domenico, A carrier is now running since 16 UTC on 8270.005 Hz. 73, Stefan Am 09.11.2017 18:45, schrieb Domenico IZ7SLZ: Hi, Stefan Thanks for reply. Yes linux pc is using 'vttime' to calibrate so
Hi Markus, Thanks for the decoe results. Interestingly the Eb/N0 from your side is even better than from DL0AO, i did not expect this :-) A confirmation of the assumptions based on the ray propagatio
